In a previous article under title ´Can Ogaden become the Next UN Member State?´ (http://www.buzzle.com/articles/can-ogaden-become-the-next-un-member-state.html), I attacked five myths that hinder the Ogaden National Liberation Front (ONLF) in their rightful struggle toward the liberation of the illegally occupied Ogaden and the inception of the Ogaden Republic.

In a subsequent article titled ´Ogaden, Western Somalia or Ogadenia – Exploring an Ogaden – Isaaq Alliance for Somalia´ (http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/135439), I examined issues pertaining to the validity of the historical name of Ogaden as national name for the forthcoming state that will secede from the Abyssinian Hell. I also explored the chances of an Ogaden – Isaaq cooperation in view of the rise of the two groups as warrantors of Somalia´s peace and reunification.

In the present article, I intend to examine the foreign policy perspectives of the ONLF, rightful and sole representative of the Ogadenis and locomotive of Ogaden´s liberation. It is seminally important for the ONLF to undertake a well balanced effort on both levels, military (in Ogaden) and diplomatic (worldwide).

Last year´s developments in Somalia offer an excellent lesson in this regard; following the split of the Alliance for the Re-liberation of Somalia (ARS), the so-called Asmara wing, under Sheikh Hassan Dakhir Aweys, formed the Hizb ul Islam, moved to South Somalia and tried to oppose both, the France-backed TFG president and the US-backed Shabaab. The concept and the effort were correct but the diplomatic dimension was dramatically underestimated with the known troublesome results.

I will now attempt to identify potential friends and supporters, eventual sponsors and promoters of the Noble Cause of the Ogadenis who have long been discriminated, persecuted, tyrannized, and even decimated at the evil hands of the demented and racist Amhara and Tigray rulers - under any regime (despotic, third word-communist and pseudo-republican).

In this regard, and as preamble, I will state that it is always important to keep in mind a forceful rejection of the myths (denounced in my earlier article) that function as impediments.

France, England and America: Deleted from ONLF´s Policy Making Map

Given the continuous, multifaceted and effective EU and US support to the evil, racist Amhara - Tigray Abyssinian tyranny, France, England and America must be irrevocably deleted from the policy making map of the Ogadeniis and the ONLF.

It is critical to realize as soon as possible that the fact "Ogaden Republic" will not only trigger the definite collapse of the colonial pseudo-state ´Ethiopia´, but it will also cause a terrible blow to the evil US – UK plans for the entire Horn of Africa.

Ogaden, as an independent state, will be more detrimental for America, UK and the EU than for the racist and barbaric regime of the Monophysitic (Tewahedo) Abyssinians.

Ogaden, as an independent state, will consist in an unprecedented victory for all Africans, the beginning of the end of the European Anti-African Racism.

For the aforementioned reasons, the real friends and sponsors of Ogaden´s independence are to be found among America´s and Europe´s most determined enemies and most resolute opponents.

Ogaden´s Friends in Europe and the US

Only those, who realize that the Western European and North American establishments must be obliterated at all costs, can truly evaluate positively Ogaden´s need for liberation, national independence, cultural and political self-determination, freedom and socio-economic development.

The previous statement does not encompass only the great rivals of Washington, London and Paris; it also includes many Americans who totally reject the imposition of an alien Freemasonic – Zionist elite over America. There are many in America who are ready to do anything it takes to destroy the Wall Street regime of plutocracy and iniquity. There are many Americans who view Washington´s hidden masters as an Anti-Christian gang and as an abomination for the Founding Fathers´ concepts and ideals. In fact, the US is nowadays ruled by the real enemies of America as envisioned by the Founding Fathers in the late 18th century.

Similarly for Europe; there are many minorities, religious groups and ethnicities that have long been atrociously persecuted in the pseudo-democratic prisons "England" and "France"; here I don´t mean foreign workers and refugees of Islamic faith. It is true that Europe´s Muslims are by now denied to build minarets for their mosques in Switzerland, a state that is totally controlled by Freemasonic and Zionist bankers; but this is another issue, and even the European Christians are persecuted and forced to live in porno-countries whereby consumerism, corruption, abortion and homosexual marriages are undemocratically enforced by Europe´s hidden, Satanic, rulers.

The liberation movements of the Corsicans and the Basks in France, the Scottish separatists in the UK, the Catalans, the Galicians and the Basks in Spain are some of the true possible supporters of the Cause of Ogaden.

It is essential to avoid the Islamic / Christian divide; the evil Freemasonic and Zionist rulers of our world, and their academic, intellectual, military, economic and diplomatic agents are extremely apt in fake-labeling and in false flag operations.

Ogaden´s Allies: Persecuted Oriental Christians, and not Pan-Arabist Gangsters

Struggling for their national independence, the Ogadenis must unreservedly support Oriental Christians who struggle to stay in their land of origin, notably the Aramaeans of Iraq, Syria, Iran, and Lebanon.

Characteristically, in the aforementioned case, the ONLF must be well aware that they have nothing to expect from the puppets of Baghdad, Damascus and Beirut.

The besotted Pan-Arabist regimes of these countries are the object of daily deception that is systematically carried out by the European and North American diplomats. It may look probable to anyone that the unrepresentative regimes of Baghdad and Beirut are mere puppets of the Western powers; however, some may have some reserves as regards Syria, mainly because of Syria´s adamant opposition to Israel and alliance with Iran. This means that the French diplomacy marked a success is dissimulating their actions, involvement, and manipulations.

The regime of Damascus has always been sponsored by France and every divergence was merely an act of dissimulation in order to better position Damascus as the opponent to the US – UK Middle Eastern policies that France does not agree with. There has never been a single issue in which Damascus acted without this being a mere promotion of French interests in the Middle East.

Now, to suggest that France repeatedly tried to support Christian Lebanese politicians against Damascus´ interference in Lebanon and failed means total ignorance of Middle Eastern politics. France´s permanent strategy in the Middle East has been the gradual removal and ultimate eradication of Oriental Christians from the wider area of the Middle East. The Aramaeans of Aram Nahrin have extensively published on the subject.

Political Ideology: Determinant Factor for the Foreign Policy

It could not happen otherwise because what truly determines the nature and the character of a foreign policy is the political ideology of the establishment that implements the said foreign policy; if an establishment becomes the embodiment of a political ideology (in this case, the Pan-Arabism of Baath Party) produced in another country (in this case, France) and thence exported, it is absolutely impossible for the said establishment to pursue a foreign policy that does not genuinely serve the interests of the country that produced and exported the said political ideology.

In other words, it is structurally impossible to implement a foreign policy that serves a country´s national interests without rejecting foreign concepts, ideals, principles and any element of political ideology that does not emanate from the country´s cultural – behavioural – intellectual – political heritage.

I will herewith enumerate the main potential friends, allies, supporters and sponsors of the struggle of the Ogadenis for National Liberation.

Venezuela

An Oil-producing country that under President Chavez rose to international prominence by opposing the evil plans of the Yankee (US) imperialism for the entire Latin America.

Hugo Chavez´s Bolivarianism is precisely what the ONLF needs to contextualize in Eastern Africa.

The malignant stance of the Freemasonry/Zionism-controlled mass media toward President Chavez should also be a matter of study for the ONLF because the opposition to Chavez´s vilification should go in parallel with the denunciation of the Ethiopianist myth that has also been greatly diffused by the same mass media.

Ogaden may be an excellent tool of Chavez´s foreign policy as he may view his support of the ONLF as part of his bras-de-fer with the US.

Bolivia

A small Latin American country with great potential due to its natural resources. Bolivia´s support to the Cause of Ogaden can be great at both, the ideological and political levels; President Evo Morales has been the first indigenous head of state in the 470 years after the Spanish Conquest of America. As in the case of Venezuela´s Chavez, Evo Morales has been undeservedly vilified by the Freemasonry/Zionism-controlled mass media.

He will certainly find in Ogaden a means to further propagate his ideas, policies and strategies in favour of Identity, Integrity, Authenticity and Self-determination, and against alteration, assimilation and disfigurement.

Ogaden can be the beginning of great success for Chavez, Morales and their Latin American friends who steadily surface to power in other Latin American countries.

Russia

The heirs of the Soviet empire have by now evaluated their strategic errors of the Cold War era. In fact, so superficial the African policy of the late USSR was that by now Russia has been left with no allies in the African continent.

Beyond any doubt, Soviet Union´s worst mistake in Africa was the Soviet support to the fake, pseudo-communist, Amhara regime of the criminal butcher Mengistu.

The Soviets failed to understand that Derg Abyssinian elite was a barbaric, racist and neo-fascist gang that promoted racial discrimination and genocide under communist masquerade.

They then erroneously supported the pseudo-communist, barbaric Amhara-controlled state of Abyssinia against Somalia, and notably against the rightful liberation of Ogaden that was undertaken in 1977.

Through a historical viewpoint, the Horn of Africa Soviet policy in the 70s seems paranoid; it is a later and preposterous justification of the White movement against Lenin´s efforts to unify all parts of Russia!

By now, the Soviet Union has disappeared, and criticism of the mistakes and damages done runs high. The ONLF has to clarify to Russians that Ogaden constitutes an exceptional opportunity for Russia to correct the past errors and thus inaugurate a new African policy at the antipodes of the failed, Tsarist and Soviet attempts.

China

The rising superpower has followed a wrong path in Africa thus far; the effect after 15 years may be worse than the Soviet failure. Beijing failed to realize that the African continent represents a fake reality; it consists in brutal deformation of the existing realities. Africa, today, is the abnormal offspring of several centuries of illegal colonial occupation, control, massacre, and monstrous deformation. But, in spite of all the colonial deeds, the African reality is there, and it is still intact.

What was in fact the major mistake of the Soviet policy in Africa?

The fact that Moscow thought possible to extend influence over earlier uncontrolled soil whereby colonial evildoings had been planned, executed and extensively performed for more than 200 years.

But this is impossible. Not a single superpower can successfully extend influence over previously colonized territory without first totally eradicating the colonial structures.

Moscow´s past errors in Africa must become Beijing´s present lessons.

What is the colonial structure in Eastern Africa?

The fake state of Ethiopia, a fallaciously re-baptized country that is ruled by the cruel, monstrous and criminal Amhara and Tigray Monophysitic (Tewahedo) invaders of a dozen of Kushitic and Nilo-Saharan nations.

This is the fabrication that the Anti-Russian, Anti-Chinese and Anti-African Freemasonic and Zionist elites of England and France wanted to impose in the area, and for this purpose they hired the syphilis-stricken, cannibalistic "kings" of the Amharas and the Tigrays.

Without first demolishing the colonial fabrication ´Ethiopia´, China will never truly expand influence in the geo-strategically critical Horn of Africa region. To achieve this target, China needs mainly Ogaden.

Note

Picture: Chavez with Belarus´ Alexander Lukashenko